Qualifying condition
The minimum deposit and contest entry required before the bonus is paid.
Open the deskLive editorial wire
What referral claims mean, what terms can change and what to record when joining a fantasy cricket platform via a referral link.
Treat every update as provisional until the playing XI and match conditions agree.

A short field guide to reading a referral offer, confirming the attribution is correct and documenting the terms for later reference.
What a referral is
A referral offer pays a small bonus to an existing user when they invite a new user, and sometimes a matching bonus to the new user as well. The exact split is described in the operator's referral terms, which are usually a section of the main terms document.
The attribution happens through a unique code or a unique URL parameter. When the new user signs up using the code or the URL, the operator records both parties in its referral tree and credits the bonus once the new user meets the qualifying condition (typically a first deposit and a first contest).
Referral offers are common, legitimate and largely reader-friendly. The risk is that the headline number (for example, "₹500 referral bonus") can be smaller in practice than the reader expects once the qualifying conditions are applied. The COME Sports Guide refer-code desk reads the terms in detail.
Confirming attribution
After signing up with a referral code, the operator should display the referral attribution in the welcome screen, the wallet summary or the referral section of the account. If none of those places shows the attribution, the code may not have been recorded.
A simple test is to ask the friend who sent the invite whether their referral dashboard shows the new signup. The friend should see the signup within a few minutes of registration, before the first deposit.
If the attribution is missing, contact customer care with the URL you used, the time of registration and the code you typed. A responsive operator will investigate and re-attribute the signup manually.
Reading the terms
The minimum deposit and contest entry required before the bonus is paid.
Open the deskHow long the new user has to meet the qualifying condition before the bonus lapses.
Open the deskHow the bonus is divided between the inviter and the invitee. Some operators pay both; others pay only the inviter.
Open the deskWhether the bonus can be withdrawn immediately or only after a turnover requirement is met.
Open the desk
Common pitfalls
The most common pitfall is a turnover requirement on the bonus. A ₹500 bonus with a 5x turnover on contests means the reader must enter contests worth ₹2,500 before the bonus is convertible to withdrawable cash. That changes the effective value of the bonus significantly.
The second pitfall is a short expiry window. A 14-day window is fine; a 72-hour window is a pressure tactic. Read the window before signing up and plan accordingly.
The third pitfall is a referral chain rather than a single-level referral. Some operators pay the inviter's inviter as well, which can create surprising attribution patterns if the new user is referred by someone who is themselves referred by an aggressive promoter.
When not to use a code
If the bonus terms are unclear or hidden behind a click-through, treat that as a sign the bonus is not as valuable as advertised. Skipping the referral in favour of a clean signup is often the wiser choice.
If the referral URL contains a tracker parameter that does not match the operator's documented pattern, treat the URL as suspicious. The friend may have copied the URL from a forwarded message rather than from the operator's official referral dashboard.
If the friend is pushing the referral aggressively, the bonus structure may be the friend's primary motivation. The friend is not a malicious actor, but the pressure can push you past the point where you would have read the terms carefully.
Reader questions
Typically a few minutes. If the friend does not see the signup after an hour, contact customer care with the URL and the time of registration.
No. Each referral code is single-use per signup; the operator's system records the first qualifying signup and ignores later ones.
Only if the bonus terms say so. Most operators apply a turnover requirement before the bonus is convertible to withdrawable cash.
Editorial desk reference
A compact reference card for the refer-code desk, including the working checklist, the source-trail standards and the responsible-play reminder that sits behind every recommendation.
A short list of the facts to confirm before acting on a refer-code recommendation. The checklist is intentionally small so it fits in a single screen.
Every observation carries a source identifier and a timestamp. The trail makes disagreement productive and corrections easy.
Observed facts, named assumptions and visible corrections. The standard is conservative on purpose.
Readers can email the desk with the URL, the date and any evidence they have. We respond within seven working days.
A short check on the official domain, the publisher name and the licence status before acting on any refer-code recommendation.
A short note with the inputs, the expected outcome and the time of the decision. The note is the reader's audit trail.
A short post-mortem that separates process quality from result quality. The review is the foundation of better future decisions.
The COME Sports Guide desk publishes a short reference card for the refer-code topic rather than a long essay. The four reference items capture the editorial standards; the three steps capture the reader habit. A reader who runs through the checklist and the steps is well placed to make informed decisions and to keep their cricket reading habit healthy. The responsible-play reminder at the bottom of this page is not a slogan; it is the most important habit the desk can suggest. Treat every contest as entertainment that costs what you planned, never as an investment that compounds.
Continue the investigation
Save the source, note the time and compare the result with the original reasoning. That small record is the foundation of better cricket judgement.
The editorial team at COME Sports Guide approaches cricket analysis with the same rigor applied to financial reporting or scientific research. Every captain pick recommendation is grounded in measurable inputs: recent form over the last five matches, venue-specific performance, head-to-head records against the specific bowling attack, pressure performance in high-stakes situations, and historical captain success rate. The model is not a black box - the methodology is published and reproducible. The captain viability score is calculated transparently, with each input weighted according to its predictive value. The platform does not adjust recommendations based on which captain is more popular, which fantasy platform is paying for promotion, or which team has more social media followers. The recommendation is the recommendation, regardless of public perception.
The platform's prediction accuracy is tracked publicly. Monthly reports include: match winner prediction accuracy, total score prediction accuracy within 15 runs, top scorer prediction accuracy, captain pick success rate for 80+ fantasy point outcomes. The accuracy data is not cherry-picked - all predictions are tracked, including misses. The accuracy tracking allows users to evaluate the platform's performance and adjust their reliance on recommendations. The platform commits to transparency in all metrics.
The information on this page helps support informed decision-making. The captain viability index helps identify candidates with strong underlying metrics. The match prediction model provides expected outcomes with calibrated probabilities. The pitch report analysis informs venue-specific captain selection. The player database enables custom watchlists and comparison. The team analysis supports squad-level decisions. The platform does not provide a single "right answer" - it provides data and frameworks for users to make their own decisions. The most successful users combine platform recommendations with their own analysis, verifying recommendations against the published methodology.
For users who want to develop their own analysis, the platform provides: data exports in editorial formats formats, editorial coverage only, historical data going back multi-year, customizable watchlists and alerts, and editorial commentary that explains the reasoning behind recommendations. The platform is a research tool, not a prediction oracle. Users who treat it as a research tool get the most value. Users who treat predictions as guaranteed outcomes will be disappointed - predictions are probabilistic, not deterministic.